Tag: Silicon architecture

  • The maker calls it the ‘world’s worst USB drive’ but to my eyes, it’s far more impressive than any external SSD you can buy right now

    Featured image The maker calls it the worlds worst USB drive but to my eyes its far more impressive than any external SSD you can buy right now

    As artificial intelligence data centers gobble up vast amounts of memory storage, creative engineers are increasingly turning their eyes toward unconventional alternatives. When faced with the demands of the digital age, some are wondering if solutions from the 1950s and 60s hold untapped potential.

    This search for novel solutions reminds us of an extraordinary historical experiment—one that sought to push the limits of storage using magnetic-core memory. While modern engineers look at cutting-edge silicon, one self-professed tinkerer managed to create what some described as the world’s worst USB device by utilizing this vintage technology.

    This seemingly absurd endeavor delves into the world of magnetic-core memory, a storage method that was highly fashionable during the mid-20th century, long before silicon became the dominant material. These systems were foundational to monumental computing feats, powering machines like ENIAC, the IBM 704, and the Apollo Guidance Computer.

    The mechanics of magnetic-core memory rely on weaving multiple wires through tiny rings of ferrimagnetic materials. By manipulating the magnetic polarity of these rings, the system can equate direction to binary data—a simple 0 or 1. Crucially, this storage is non-volatile, meaning it retains data without power, much like NAND flash.

    Despite its historical significance, magnetic-core memory proved incredibly limited in capacity. The device created by the tinkerer, though clever in concept, topped out at a mere 64 bits of storage. For context, an IBM 1957 magnetic-core unit offered a capacity of 147,456 bits, though it came with significant drawbacks, including heavy weight and costly rental fees.

    The contrast between these early methods and today’s silicon-based storage, such as external SSDs, is stark. Modern chips offer vastly superior speed and capacity. Yet, there remains a palpable sense that something might be lost in the transition to purely silicon architectures. A handful of chips on a printed circuit board simply do not possess the same aesthetic or “vibe” as the physical, magnetic history these older systems represent.

    The resulting creation from Polymatt is now a fascinating piece of history—a reminder that ingenuity thrives even in the most constrained environments. Though the specific project has moved into the past, its beauty and mechanical complexity continue to inspire modern creators, pushing us to reimagine how we store the information that fuels our digital world.

    64 rings means 64 bits. Only 16 million times more to have 1 GB drive.