UK wants people to be rude to AI: ‘No thank yous needed’
The New Etiquette of AI: Why We Should Stop Thanking the Machines
The conversation around artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving, moving beyond capability and into the realm of etiquette. Recently, the UK government issued a reminder to employees, asking them to refrain from thanking AI systems when they produce an output, even when that output is perfectly correct. This seemingly minor guideline is actually a profound statement about the economics, environmental impact, and psychological relationship we are building with these powerful tools.
This advice isn’t about remembering that AI is not sentient or “alive”; it’s rooted in a much more practical concern: the fact that these systems are horrifically expensive and carry a significant environmental footprint. As part of broader guidelines on using AI ethically and sustainably, the government is pushing for a focus on efficiency, which led to the recommendation to treat AI output more like a tool than a companion.
The underlying philosophy is simple: recognize that the energy and resources required to train and run these large models have a cost that demands a different kind of interaction. This realization encourages a shift in how we engage with technology, moving away from anthropomorphizing the machines and towards practical efficiency.
To operationalize this philosophy, the guidelines suggest three key rules for interacting with AI effectively:
- Keep your prompts short, clear, and direct.
- Use as few prompts as possible; you don’t need to say thank you.
- Only use AI when it is genuinely needed for the task at hand.
This shift mirrors the broader economic changes happening in the AI sector. In the past, the mantra was often “use AI or lose your job,” driving a frantic race to maximize usage. However, as costs began to skyrocket—with companies moving away from flat subscription models toward pay-per-token structures—the focus naturally pivoted. If the cost and environmental impact become too burdensome, the question shifts to whether a simpler tool, like a spreadsheet or a standard search engine, could achieve the same result.
This is where the etiquette of AI becomes a powerful commentary on our reliance on technology. Being deliberately ungrateful to an AI is, perhaps, the most effective way to acknowledge the environmental and financial reality behind its capabilities. It serves as a silent protest against the sheer expenditure involved.
Ultimately, discouraging polite interaction with machines is a tacit acknowledgment that the convenience of AI must be weighed against its true cost. It invites us to pause and consider whether our dependence on these sophisticated systems is truly warranted, making the interaction between human and machine a far more responsible and efficient venture.
Buy on Amazon
Credit
