Tag: Hardware design

  • In old PCs, what was the function of the “Turbo” button?

    There are certain relics in the history of technology that manage to capture the imagination, not just for their complexity, but for their sheer, charming simplicity. One such forgotten feature belongs to the golden age of personal computing: the legendary Turbo button.

    Long before modern operating systems and sleek graphical interfaces dominated the desktop experience, the control panel of early personal computers offered a different kind of interaction—one that was tactile, immediate, and delightfully straightforward. Alongside the standard Power and Reset functions, these pioneering machines featured an extra button: the Turbo button.

    What exactly did this little button do? While it might seem like a minor footnote in the grand scheme of computer history, understanding its purpose reveals much about the design philosophy of those early systems. In essence, the Turbo button served as a quick shortcut, designed to provide users with rapid access to specific, often complex, system tasks.

    In an era when computing was still relatively raw and required direct interaction with the machine’s core functions, these shortcuts were invaluable. The presence of such a dedicated button speaks to a time when hardware controls were primary, allowing power users to fine-tune their experience with minimal clicks and maximum efficiency.

    It’s a lovely reminder that innovation doesn’t always mean adding complexity; sometimes, the most elegant solutions are those that offer a perfectly tailored shortcut for the user. The Turbo button stands as a charming piece of retro design, illustrating how technology evolves, leaving behind little historical gems along the way.

  • Valve doesn’t currently have ‘any specific plans’ for more Steam Machine faceplates, so you’ll have to make them yourself

    Featured image Valve doesnt currently have any specific plans for more Steam Machine faceplates so youll have to make them yourself

    When a new piece of hardware hits the market, the immediate question for many enthusiasts isn’t just its performance—it’s the potential for personalization. For the recently unveiled Steam Machine, that focus immediately turned to the customizable aesthetics, specifically those iconic faceplates.

    While we all love tinkering and tweaking, when it comes to custom hardware, there are clear lines drawn between hobbyist fun and commercial enterprise. Valve, the creators of the Steam Machine, has offered a fascinating glimpse into where they draw that line regarding their hardware design.

    Speaking with Valve engineers Yazan Aldehayyat and Pierre-Loup Griffais about the customization options revealed a pragmatic approach to open source hardware. Currently, the 2TB model comes with standard faceplates—the familiar red fabric and solid walnut finish. However, this doesn’t mean creative expression is locked away; in fact, Valve has stepped up the game by providing the necessary blueprints for anyone who wants to design their own look.

    The key to unlocking custom creativity lies in Valve’s decision to release detailed CAD files. These files include all the dimensions, attachment points for magnets, and sizing information needed for users to manufacture their own faceplates and casings. This move successfully empowers the community, allowing people tinkering at home to design exactly what they want without needing direct input from the original developers.

    This philosophy of open design is crucial, especially when considering third-party accessory makers. For example, peripheral company Dbrand had attempted to commercialize custom housing for the Steam Machine, teasing a concept like the Companion Cube case. However, this venture ultimately had to be pulled back.

    The reason for the retraction was simple: Dbrand had not obtained Valve’s permission to manufacture and sell these custom items commercially. This established a clear boundary—while personal projects and non-profit modifications are welcome, turning customization into a profitable business requires official clearance from the hardware creators.

    So, while commercial entities cannot profit from designing proprietary hardware accessories, the door remains wide open for enthusiasts to experiment. If you dream of making your own custom companion cube or unique faceplate inspired by the Steam Machine, the tools are there. The focus shifts from selling finished goods to fostering a vibrant, creative ecosystem built on shared designs and open specifications.

  • AMD engineer 3D-prints Steam Machine-a-like with diagonal mobo mounting — parts include a Mini ITX motherboard, RTX 5060, and a flex ATX PSU

    The quest for accessible, high-performance gaming hardware often leads enthusiasts down fascinating and challenging paths. While mainstream alternatives frequently fall short of the vision set by giants like Valve’s Steam Machine, a dedicated community is continually pushing boundaries, seeking ways to blend cutting-edge components with creative design.

    One such initiative is the Terk Box v1.1, a compelling piece of DIY engineering that attempts to capture the spirit of custom PC building within a compact, accessible form factor.

    This project is the result of collaboration between Jacob Terkelsen, an expert with AMD, and the 3D printing community member 3DCatt. Their goal was to create a solution that addresses the physical limitations inherent in smaller form factors, aiming for a machine that feels both functional and thoughtfully designed.

    The creation of the Terk Box v1.1 is not just about aesthetics; it’s a deep dive into the realities of component compatibility. As with any miniaturized build, fitting massive graphics cards and adequate ventilation presents unique hurdles. Builders found themselves navigating tight constraints, particularly concerning GPU length and the necessary space for airflow.

    The finished v1.1 model measures 167 x 168 x 225mm. While this size is a compromise compared to official Mini-ITX standards, it represents a significant step forward in realizing a functional, custom gaming experience using accessible methods. The process highlighted real-world engineering challenges—like ensuring proper component positioning relative to the power supply and managing the tricky placement of essential cooling elements.

    Despite these practical compromises, the effort demonstrates a commitment to innovation. Feedback from the community noted that refining the design for future iterations is crucial. The ongoing discussion points toward improvements in ventilation and component accommodation, suggesting that version 2.0 will undoubtedly be smoother and more optimized.

    Ultimately, the Terk Box v1.1 stands as a testament to the power of open-source design and community collaboration. It reminds us that even when faced with commercial constraints, ingenuity can lead to groundbreaking hardware solutions, providing a blueprint for how we can continue to redefine what compact PC gaming can look like.