Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 NVMe SSD speed test
This text contains structured performance data and a critical opinion piece regarding various NVMe SSDs, focusing heavily on the Kioxia Exceria Pro G2.
Here is a summary and extraction of the key information:
—
1. Performance Data Summary
The text presents two main data tables comparing different SSDs across loading times and IOPS benchmarks.
A. Loading Time Comparison (Time in Seconds)
B. Random I/OPS Comparison (CrystalDiskMark)
—
2. Critical Analysis and Conclusion
The author’s commentary shifts from raw data to a subjective assessment of the Kioxia Exceria Pro G2:
Key Performance Observations:
Load Times: The Exceria Pro G2 recorded a total load time of 8.332 seconds, which the author notes is slow compared to the other drives listed.
Real-World vs. Advertised: The author suggests that while the hardware is capable, the real-world results do not “hit the wham-bam hammer” of its competitors, implying the firmware or optimization is lacking.
Comparison to Contemporaries: When compared to the WD Black SN8100, the random 4K performance of the Exceria Pro G2 (90 MB/s read / 311 MB/s write) is deemed “hardly breathtaking numbers.”
Thermal Performance: Compared to the Fury Renegade G5, the Exceria Pro G2 was 5 degrees hotter while offering less bandwidth.
Final Verdict:
The author concludes that the Kioxia Exceria Pro G2 is “solid, dependable, average.” While it doesn’t lead in raw performance, the author grants it credit for being a solid all-rounder and for the company (Kioxia) keeping PCIe 5.0 options available, suggesting that its existence is valuable for the industry even if it isn’t the absolute best performer.